> some sort of fallacy that I'm too lazy to look up. Is it? I didn't object to the rest of your comment but I don't see how it was relevant either. > He was

> some sort of fallacy that I'm too lazy to look up. Is it? I didn't object to the rest of your comment but I don't see how it was relevant either. > He was donating half his salary while working at Jane Street. So do we actually know that he was doing that, or is that just another example of everyone taking him at his word? > Everything you said could be applied to all charitable giving. Most people don't congregate to discuss how charitable they are, so not really.