5 ms·
Or, perhaps you should realize that the "logical" arguments are not actually logical and have been repeatedly refuted.
by jdp23 15y ago
Or, perhaps you should realize that the "logical" arguments are not actually logical and have been repeatedly refuted.
- prodigal_erik 15y agoIf you're trying to win over rational people, and refutations are out there to be had, they need to be included. Anyone who thinks "everyone says this argument has the same glaring flaws, and that illustrates how awesome the argument is!" is at risk of reaching conspiracy-theory levels of crazy.
- jdp23 15y agoThe author explained why the people making the traditional arguments do in fact illustrate how accurate his observation is. It's true though that articles won't reach guys are so defensive or clueless on this subject that they're not responding rationally.