4 ms·
anything they can do to limit the frequency of coach challenges and replay reviews is a good thing in my book. i'm blown away that we still use three or four of
by localhost3000 15y ago
anything they can do to limit the frequency of coach challenges and replay reviews is a good thing in my book. i'm blown away that we still use three or four oft-poor camera angles to try and determine whether or not a ball crossed a straight line.
other than that, i still think football should be played on a grass (preferably muddy) field with the outcome determined by grit, determination, chance, and physical ability - not robots picking from a statistically optimal playbook. That being said, it will be pretty funny to see the geeks take over the NFL.
- Anechoic 15y agoi still think football should be played on a grass (preferably muddy) field As someone who had football-related knee-reconstruction surgery, I respectfully disagree. Yeah, there's something nostalgic about 22 players slogging their way through a mud-covered field, but it just results in way too many ankle, knee and hip injuries. We have field turf, let's stick with it.