3 ms·
This was a point of contention for a minute on the radio show- the host was flummoxed as well that the insurance company "valued" the trip higher than what the
by zdragnar 4y ago
This was a point of contention for a minute on the radio show- the host was flummoxed as well that the insurance company "valued" the trip higher than what the hospital billed for.
It's possible that the (clearly upset) father on the phone had the story mixed up, but I'm not sure that NY law would allow an estimate for a medical bill to end up being billed at more than double the original estimate. Hell, in my state car repairs can't exceed 10% of the original estimate without approval from the customer. Either way it shakes out, if the story is real the state commissioners are going to have fun with it.
- HCDevid 4y agoOn US healthcare bills there is: Billed Amount - what the provider/health system tags as the “billed amount” Allowed Amount - what the insurer sets as the actual total $ allowed to change hands for the visit Patient Responsibility - the portion the patient is responsible for. The Billed Amount is supposed to exceed the Allowed Amount by 2.5-5x typically so that the Allowed Amount the insurer/provider has negotiated “saves” money thanks to Insurance ostensibly in how the bill is displayed. Put differently, your provider/health system is supposed to per the billing contract put in an inflated value well in excess of expected payment so your insurance company can reduce it so you can “save money” superficially on your bill. It is as smoke and mirrors as it sounds. Sounds like your provider / HS forgot healthcare billing 101 in this case. The Billed - Allowed Amount value is also usually called Contractual Adjustment