3 ms·
I really doubt the world is going to standardize over that specific style of implementation and, frankly, the semantic web is dead. Long live the bazaar...
by pdntspa 4y ago
I really doubt the world is going to standardize over that specific style of implementation and, frankly, the semantic web is dead. Long live the bazaar...
- dmitriid 4y agoThose are literally standards. With very specific semantics and expectations https://github.com/for-GET/know-your-http-well/blob/master/methods.md https://github.com/for-GET/know-your-http-well/blob/master/m...
- pdntspa 4y agoAnd the number of projects that I have seen follow them is fewer than the number of projects that just seem to wing it. Which is my point... perhaps this standard is superficial and unnecessary, and maybe we should discard it. IETF/whoever can write whatever they want, I only care about what I actually encounter. That's "standardization" edit- All those nice looking checkboxes depend on the individual implementation. It's a nice concept but how many projects have actually implemented it to the conventions about idempotency/etc shown? edit2- who is for-GET anyway? A random github link doesn't have much more worth than a random Medium link