Hmm, I guess it's just that establishing China as a memetic threat is an admission that the marketplace of ideas was itself an illusion crafted to appease, cont

Hmm, I guess it's just that establishing China as a memetic threat is an admission that the marketplace of ideas was itself an illusion crafted to appease, contain, and diffuse critique and wouldn't that be a kicking out a sort of load-bearing idea for a lot of people? I suppose I'm having a hard time grasping at how letting the cat out of the bag could be contained to just China, but maybe I'm missing something. It feels like it's a perfectly logical conclusion to say, "The ability to control the narrative ideas stops at existential threats to the US government and it's economic hegemony." Doesn't that sort of seem like a totalitarian stance? Maybe that's more acceptable to people than I thought?