4 ms·
I agree 100%. It's the same as public outcries about world leaders flying government planes to climate summits. It's not controversial at all to me, but it seem
by jupp0r 4y ago
I agree 100%. It's the same as public outcries about world leaders flying government planes to climate summits. It's not controversial at all to me, but it seems to be to a vast number of people out there for some reason.
- actionfromafar 4y agoJennifer Government has a hilarious example of what can happen if someone were to try to “fix” this problem.
- prepend 4y agoI think it’s different because there are other options for world leader climate summits (eg, make them virtual) where as there is not a replacement for physically needing to be in a secure test location in the middle of the desert. I’ve read more about celebrity attendance and private jets and the replacement for those photo ops seems similarly not relatable to this example.
- jupp0r 4y agoThe overarching point is that it doesn't matter in the scheme of things. It's outrageous as an example but it misses the point that industrial regulation and society wide incentives are needed to tackle climate change, not individual behavior changes of an extremely small group of people.
- Diesel555 4y agoEven the world leaders need to meet in person. When you have people with that level of impact on policy - virtual meetings just do not have the same effect. They need to meet in person, talk, have side-bars, read body-language, get a drink together, do human things while solving human problems.