Totally agree. I am extremely annoyed at the general article submitted versus the actual paper focus. While I respect the need for these longterm survey data

Totally agree. I am extremely annoyed at the general article submitted versus the actual paper focus. While I respect the need for these longterm survey data collection efforts, I am not sure I would frankly trust that survey to even accurately be able to tease out high-intensity vs low-intensity efforts from people participating in the study. And the tie-in from the cohort survey results back into the motivation for the mouse study just isn't done at all. I mean out of their 148 patients with SEER scores, they make no mention at all at metastatic disease occurence or even attempt to tie that figure back to exercise intensity . . .