Just as an analogy, can a person majoring in architecture not do drawing or designing? Of course drawing and designing is most of architectural education. The

Just as an analogy, can a person majoring in architecture not do drawing or designing? Of course drawing and designing is most of architectural education. The problem is that unlike CS, architecture is a studio practice and a principal pedagogical premise is the only way to demonstrate design ability is by executing a design against constraints. Another principle premise is that while there are objectively better and worse executions, there is no objectively correct solution. So no multiple choice tests in the design studio. Finally, soft skills are part of the curriculum. Students have to present their work and stand there while others talk about it. Basically a long series of whiteboard interviews where the whiteboard contains weeks of work. Sure programming could be taught in a studio environment. But probably not CS because the studio is not part of science pedagogy. And to be clear, the studio dominates architectural education. All nighters are normal and expected because more work is how better is achieved and projects are only done because time has run out. None of which is part of science education.