3 ms·
> Blockchain is a valid solution for fast settlement clearing especially between market participants. JPM and Visa have already proven it their private blockcha
by vesinisa 4y ago
> Blockchain is a valid solution for fast settlement clearing especially between market participants. JPM and Visa have already proven it their private blockchains.
Now, have they? I was surprised to hear this because I was under the impression that blockchain is generally useless in an environment where the participants can trust each other. I searched for "visa jp morgan blockchain" and found these:
https://www.forbes.com/sites/emilymason/2022/10/11/jp-morgan-and-visa-bridge-their-private-blockchain-networks-to-streamline-global-payments/amp/ https://www.forbes.com/sites/emilymason/2022/10/11/jp-morgan...
https://www.finextra.com/newsarticle/41102/jpmorgan-and-visa-link-blockchain-payment-networks https://www.finextra.com/newsarticle/41102/jpmorgan-and-visa...
It seems that JP Morgan is offering a service called "Confirm" to validate account numbers, which Visa is using. This service is apparently offered on a blockchain. But nowhere does it say that these companies would be using a blockchain to actually settle real transactions. And it indeed seems a service to validate account numbers could just as well be offered with a more traditional API, like HTTP/JSON, instead of blockchain.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- esja 4y agoAll the big banks have projects like these. As soon as the hype fades and the CIOs can stop telling their board "yes we're investing in blockchain", the projects will be cancelled.