I had a theory... could it be that if he forces enough people out, the company goes under and any debts the company holds are specific to Twitter... he is off t

I had a theory... could it be that if he forces enough people out, the company goes under and any debts the company holds are specific to Twitter... he is off the hook and could only lose a couple of billion, but not be on the hook for the full 44. I heard there were links between the debt and Tesla stock, but if the company goes under for a reason of "all employees left", could that be "not his fault"? Another option is that the previous stuff he worked on (Tesla, SpaceX, Paypal?) were game changers and had people wanting to work for them, and he thinks that Twitter is the same... But, my guess is it is not... people worked for twitter cause it was a good gig and paid well, but was not a game changer. If the culture changes overnight and now you have to work 20-50% more time with the same or less money and now less resources in house, screw that...