Except it's not alive, or a child, the law explicitly says so. But anyway, you understand that you're demanding specifically that women alone should be subject

Except it's not alive, or a child, the law explicitly says so. But anyway, you understand that you're demanding specifically that women alone should be subject to a medical procedure to protect the life of a fetus, but once a child is born then they aren't required to undergo any other medical procedures to save the life of a child that is actually alive. Because that's what the law is currently: no matter the cost, physically, emotionally, or financially, all women shall be required to go through pregnancy. And that is the _only_ case, and women are the only subjects of such mandates. There's no law requiring that the father have all blood and compatibility tests in the even blood or organ donations are needed. The law is very clear: it does not matter if performing a medical procedure on one person will save another, you cannot force anyone, in any circumstance, to undergo that procedure. The only people, and the only case, where this is exception is made is conservatives who are primarily concerned about controlling others. It's like those shitheads who then go "put the child up for adoption" but then shit on and underfund the foster system (the pro-birth crowd are super determined to ensure such services are underfunded, because they don't actually give two shits about children), and have not adopted a single child (because again, this has nothing to do with caring about children, and everything to do with punishing women who for whatever reason get pregnant). So yeah, I have no problem thinking of forced-birth people as being self serving assholes who don't give two shits about anyone other than themselves.