> Not sure what what the people pushing this narrative aren’t understanding. From the other day, it seems, they're angry that the NYT isn't saying, in exact wo

> Not sure what what the people pushing this narrative aren’t understanding. From the other day, it seems, they're angry that the NYT isn't saying, in exact words, "SBF is a massive criminal who committed massive fraud". And when you respond and say "That's because their lawyers understand the concept of defamation", they say "well, then they just need to talk to people and have them say it so everyone knows he's a criminal and committed fraud".