4 ms·
Think of "idiocy" as the lack of intelligence, rather than a separate entity of its own, similarly to how high-school physics (and therefore, contemporary commo
by 1attice 4y ago
Think of "idiocy" as the lack of intelligence, rather than a separate entity of its own, similarly to how high-school physics (and therefore, contemporary common sense!) understands cold as the absence of heat.
This means that you can get rid of idiocy by adding intelligence to a system, in the same way that you can warm up a room with a space heater.
But how do you build up intelligence? Put it this way. Your onboard wetware neural network needs to iterate on e.g. pulling out of a slide, and a bunch of other stuff that you won't know how to do unless someone trains you. No iteration means no gradient, and no gradient means 'no smart'.
So if you want to defeat idiocy, you need training. Now, you can train you, but of course, you'll never know if the training was complete.
Thus the obvious antidote to e-vehicle idiocy-at-scale[1] is, yes, formal lessons and deliberate practice. Just like driving. Just like piano.
[1] a friend from grad school who is Korean told me that there's a word in Korean that literally means "road stupid" and this is the only fact I know about Korean and I love it. So many people are road stupid! I'm one of them! I'm trying to improve!
- FpUser 4y ago>"Now, you can train you, but of course, you'll never know if the training was complete." Deliberate practice I understand. The proposed "formal training" for this specific case however would not know "if the training is complete" either. They'll just be taking your money.
- 1attice 4y agoWell, they're welcome to it -- at least once a week, I use dodge-skid-stop, a specific skill I formally acquired by trying to do it and dropping the training bike a bunch while a grouchy 65yo biker glowered at my incompetence until it evaporated. Take my money