4 ms·
Judges won't side with him, like, at all. >The point is to argue that he was sloppy or inattentive, not a fraudster. If that's going to be his strategy there'
by moralestapia 4y ago
Judges won't side with him, like, at all.
>The point is to argue that he was sloppy or inattentive, not a fraudster.
If that's going to be his strategy there's still a lot of laughs to have at his expense.
If only it were that easy, "oh I didn't knew I was crossing the border with a hundred pounds of cocaine in my car", like, how come they never thought of THAT? LOL
- notch656a 4y agoIs that not a valid defense? It's my understanding it's not uncommon for criminals to plant stuff on a marks car and then secretly grab it after it crosses the border. Possession of something should require your intent to control/keep it or at least knowledge it exists.
- bin_bash 4y agoIt is iff you can convince a jury that's the case.
- Dopameaner 4y agoMaybe could get away with light sentencing If it was few billionaire investors. I don't see how he doesn't get life for screwing so many investors.
- lazide 4y agoIt is not - drug possession is a strict liability crime for that reason. That said if it is some random retired couple with zero idea what is going on and 10 kilos of coke in their spare tire, as long as they co-operate, most gov’ts wouldn’t prosecute them.
- encryptluks2 4y agoI imagine for him it is going to be something more like, "I didn't know she wasn't 18."