3 ms·

I'm not sure how you'd read this as a puff piece. The reporter described his reaction to the interview as "appalled".

• kranke155 4y ago
  I’ve edited to clarify. I actually posted before I read the article (typical!).
  • yodon 4y ago
    >I actually posted before I read the article (typical!) I'm not sure whether you're saying "I did something bad, repeatedly, but it's ok because I'm admitting it" (while arguing someone else who did something bad shouldn't be let off the hook for admitting they did something bad), or whether instead you're taking pride in routinely acting in a way that subtracts value from the community (while arguing someone else who acted in ways detrimental to the community should receive harsher judgements than you feel he's received). Either reading suggests an opportunity for productive self reflection. Posting criticisms of articles you haven't read isn't the scale of damage that SBF caused, but the belief that "I'm not intending to cause harm so the harm I'm causing isn't real" appears to be at the root of both sets of outcomes. The impact of SBF's actions was higher simply because one day he found himself holding a larger lever than most of us have the occasion to hold. It's good to be in practice, should that day come.
    • kranke155 4y ago
      That's an interesting perspective and I certainly agree with it.