3 ms·
Definitely Musk's fault he bought it. It sounds like the made the initial offer without due diligence and then realized what he was buying and it was too late.
by ben7799 4y ago
Definitely Musk's fault he bought it.
It sounds like the made the initial offer without due diligence and then realized what he was buying and it was too late.
It's just there's this bizarre reaction to all this that everyone at Twitter was awesome and Twitter was on fire executing flawlessly and making huge money.
In reality it sounds like it was a company not expecting much of it's team, not making much money, and stuck with leadership team that didn't know what to do.
Meanwhile everyone is knee jerk defending everything about Twitter because they think Musk is going to turn it into a MAGA social network. Maybe he is. That doesn't mean the company was perfect before he bought it.
- skinnymuch 4y ago> It's just there's this bizarre reaction to all this that everyone at Twitter was awesome and Twitter was on fire executing flawlessly and making huge money. Can you show examples of this? I haven't heard this. Many have heard or know Twitter was losing money. Stuff like losing $4M/day have been said by friends who aren't in tech. Twitter being on fire flawlessly is definitely not something that is said much. Nor being perfect.
- ben7799 4y agoGo look at comments at some place like Ars Technica. They are covering/click-baiting all this stuff like crazy. I don't know how clued in commenters are there or if they are actually tech workers but the groupthink there is very strong. I think a lot of it is conflating the perceived political leaning of the company before Musk versus Musk's bizarre trend to the right and assuming any of that has to do with the company's execution.
- skinnymuch 4y agoI was going to say maybe you’re right. Then I checked Ars Technica. I went to the last two Twitter stories. Which are also Elon stories. No one was saying what you’re claiming. Can you show a few examples or at least point out the news article and roughly where the comment is? I’m sure there are enough of them since I also saw a first comment saying they wish they shorted Twitter when they had the chance. Some one corrected them right after but still it’s not filled with the highest degree of seriousness. — Why would they be tech workers? I know friends who go to that site. One works as a PM in tech. That doesn’t mean much though. The rest don’t. It’s for tech oriented geeks in general. I don’t think they cover anything specific about programming or data science, etc.
- zimpenfish 4y ago> Stuff like losing $4M/day have been said by friends who aren't in tech. That's only after the leveraged buyout saddling them with $1bn/year in debt payments. According to their 2021 financials[1] they lost $221m (~$600k/day) after a settlement payout of $809m (which I think means they made ~$588m or ~$1.6m/day, no?) [1] https://news.yahoo.com/twitter-posts-loss-2021-stock-130128001.html https://news.yahoo.com/twitter-posts-loss-2021-stock-1301280...
- skinnymuch 4y agoThis suggests people are being harsher with Twitter than they should be. Hah.