While I don't agree with the person you're replying to exactly on tactics, I think they have a point. The #1 priority should not be the kid. The #1 priority s

While I don't agree with the person you're replying to exactly on tactics, I think they have a point. The #1 priority should not be the kid. The #1 priority should be the benefit of all kids. In this example risk is introduced to the custodial relationship of the immediate child for the hopeful benefit of all children. It's possible this could be a rational risk. Whether it would be effective I have my doubts. If we use some arbitrary numbers perhaps it would be just to risk 1/1000 chance your own kid gets tossed in foster care by CPS if it means 10 unknown kids end up with 10% longer lifespan because they built healthy habits by being able to play alone outside because a threatening old lady got put in her place.