3 ms·
> The person you are quoting is asking the fire department to do extra work, not questioning the correctness of the fire department's conclusions. Correct. I'm
by josefresco 4y ago
> The person you are quoting is asking the fire department to do extra work, not questioning the correctness of the fire department's conclusions.
Correct. I'm saying that the lack of record keeping/reporting has me questioning the validity of the reported number of fires.
If you tell me your record keeping is poor/vague, I'm not going to blindly trust a statement like: "don't worry these records are accurate".
- Kon-Peki 4y agoIn my first response, I wasn't sure of your motives and gave you the benefit of the doubt. Now I am sure of your motives. "Dozens of photographs and pages of supporting evidence lead to the conclusion that the fire started in the battery of the e-bike" Is obviously fake because it doesn't list the brand of the battery or the bike. No matter that the labels were burned off in the fire and were probably fake in the first place. You want to know where they came from? Ask the owner where he bought it, and then ask that seller, and go up the chain. The owners are much more likely to cooperate with the advocacy group rather than the fire investigator, but never mind that. Give me a break. "You say the fire was started with gasoline, but unless you can tell me which gas station it came from I don't even believe there was a fire"
- constantcrying 4y agoFirefighters fight fires. How recognizable do you think a burned up e-bike is? Do you think firefighters have nothing better to do than go through photos of fires with e-bikes involved? Their report keeping is "poor" because the job of a firefighter isn't to spent hours investigating which model of e-bike might have caused the fire.