3 ms·
Keep in mind this is for AngelList Talent, not AngelList. It's typically very common to create more of a differentiation between your products, rather than usin
by metadaemon 4y ago
Keep in mind this is for AngelList Talent, not AngelList. It's typically very common to create more of a differentiation between your products, rather than using the same name for both. Before it was angellist.com and angel.co. Is that really more understandable?
- sf_rob 4y agoAgree that the current situation was not ideal, but it was habituated at this point and now they're replacing one non-ideal solution with another one (in my opinion). If they want to differentiate products, how about rebranding as TalentList or something like that to keep the association and buying talentlist.com and/or talentlist.co (neither of which is being used; both of which are registered). Let angel.co be a redirect; keep AngelList branding. Agree that angel.co is confusing. I would have rather seen them use angellist.com as a lander to direct clients to talent.angellist.com and venture.angellist.com, but 1) it's too late for that now, 2) that doesn't differentiate brand which I accept as a goal.