5 ms·
I didn't see anything about them filtering out repos which have been abandoned, were only for testing, or other such considerations. The title is technically co
by _aavaa_ 4y ago
I didn't see anything about them filtering out repos which have been abandoned, were only for testing, or other such considerations. The title is technically correct, but I feel that most people would interpret it as "82% of active Open-Source projects".
- elischleifer 4y agogreat point. I didn't see a mechanism for filtering out stale projects - if that is a GH concept inside CodeSearch. TLDR; there are a lot of active projects running rusty / rotten tools
- _aavaa_ 4y agoI don't see how you can claim that TLDR without a measure of how many of the results are active projects. Similarly, it's a strong claim to equate "non-latest release" with "rusty/rotten tooling".
- seba_dos1 4y ago> The title is technically correct Is it? Where did the 82% figure even come from? Are 82% of all Open Source projects even written in languages with tooling that promotes projects to self-manage their dependencies? The world doesn't end at JavaScript, Python, or even Rust.
- _aavaa_ 4y agoFair enough. What I meant was "even if the tittle is technically correct".