3 ms·
> but I'd rather install a VM WSL is a proper VM, just managed very efficiently by Hyper-V. > the filesystem has its (performance) limitations It's a normal
by sz4kerto 4y ago
> but I'd rather install a VM
WSL is a proper VM, just managed very efficiently by Hyper-V.
> the filesystem has its (performance) limitations
It's a normal Linux filesystem, there's no difference in performance vs. a full-fledged Linux VM. (which it is anyway)
Are you referring to WSL1?
- pxc 4y ago> > the filesystem has its (performance) limitations > It's a normal Linux filesystem, there's no difference in performance vs. a full-fledged Linux VM. (which it is anyway) > Are you referring to WSL1? WSL2 just exchanged the performance problems with the Linux guest environment's native filesystem for performance problems when the Linux guest accesses Windows' filesystem. Those are still there and they're still atrocious.