> If AGI has even a 1% chance of happening this century and those donations reduce the risk of it going wrong and killing everyone by 1% that's still money very

> If AGI has even a 1% chance of happening this century and those donations reduce the risk of it going wrong and killing everyone by 1% that's still money very well spent. This line of thinking leads to some problems. There's always some threshold of likelihood where if it provide some arbitrarily high enough good/harm reduction that lets you rationalize basically any possible position. For instance, give me all your money, I'll give you 8% monthly returns!