3 ms·
As one of the comments under the article mentions, there is some discussion of what is now called P versus NP in the correspondence between Gödel and Von Neuman
by danbruc 4y ago
As one of the comments under the article mentions, there is some discussion of what is now called P versus NP in the correspondence between Gödel and Von Neumann from 1956. Which is earlier than Cobham but later than Pocklington and was itself only discovered in the late 80s. [1][2]
[1] http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~odonnell/15455-s17/hartmanis-on-godel-von-neumann.pdf http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~odonnell/15455-s17/hartmanis-on-godel...
[2] https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/bulletin-of-symbolic-logic/article/abs/von-neumann-godel-and-complexity-theory/8F133F1B5742612B7E118BDE7A59AF65 https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/bulletin-of-symbolic...