> Yes, and that's why the strawman is bad. No, thats why it is good. It is discussed thousands of times *because* none of the solutions are satisfactory. > EA

> Yes, and that's why the strawman is bad. No, thats why it is good. It is discussed thousands of times *because* none of the solutions are satisfactory. > EA folks don't in practice follow or advocate for any form of ethical system that leads to doctors killing people for their organs. But the axioms they evangelize imply that. And this is essentially what Bankman has done financially.