11 ms·
> Yes, that has been discussed thousands of times in the literature. Yes, and that's why the strawman is bad. EA folks don't in practice follow or advocate fo
by concordDance 4y ago
> Yes, that has been discussed thousands of times in the literature.
Yes, and that's why the strawman is bad.
EA folks don't in practice follow or advocate for any form of ethical system that leads to doctors killing people for their organs.
- cscurmudgeon 4y ago> Yes, and that's why the strawman is bad. No, thats why it is good. It is discussed thousands of times *because* none of the solutions are satisfactory. > EA folks don't in practice follow or advocate for any form of ethical system that leads to doctors killing people for their organs. But the axioms they evangelize imply that. And this is essentially what Bankman has done financially.