But that's the point in a sense. Zeihan sells a vision of geopolitics that is what popular science is to science. It is not bad, but it does shortcuts and simpl

But that's the point in a sense. Zeihan sells a vision of geopolitics that is what popular science is to science. It is not bad, but it does shortcuts and simplifications to fit in a one-hour talk ala TedX where seats are sold for four or five figures. It was fine until Zeihan and co started getting the mic at institutions like the US military academies or some congress special interest groups. I'm unfavorable when popular [discipline] may swing around to influence what it was meant to cover.