3 ms·
In other words, Apollo 6, 1968. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollo_6 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollo_6
by rippercushions 4y ago
In other words, Apollo 6, 1968.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollo_6 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollo_6
- andsoitis 4y agoArtemis I is a step in the Artemis Program, which has the stated purpose of building a sustainable human presence on and around the moon. https://www.space.com/artemis-program.html https://www.space.com/artemis-program.html Elsewhere in this discussion thread there's also cynicism as to why NASA isn't using cheaper / more efficient SpaceX hardware. I won't go into arguing all the criticism that's thrown at the edges, but instead simply point out that NASA has awarded SpaceX a $1.15b contract for second Artemis mission. https://spacenews.com/nasa-awards-spacex-1-15-billion-contract-for-second-artemis-lander-mission/ https://spacenews.com/nasa-awards-spacex-1-15-billion-contra...