3 ms·
I was thinking along the same lines, but everything leaving Russia. Tanks and other equipment as well. Either way this is still interference
by tekknik 4y ago
I was thinking along the same lines, but everything leaving Russia. Tanks and other equipment as well. Either way this is still interference
- josephcsible 4y agoIsn't it an important difference that we're not killing people if we just shoot down missiles, but we are if we blow up tanks too?
- tekknik 4y agoIt’s certainly better in my mind, who knows how Russia will take it. Even with missiles you are still interfering with the attacks. That’ll raise aggression against NATO.
- josephcsible 4y ago> you are still interfering with the attacks If we don't interfere with the attacks at all, then aren't we effectively letting them get away with attacking a NATO state? And if we do that, won't they get even bolder?