This such a sad partisan take. Why would the NYT want to help a disgraced person they have no need to be loyal to? It’s not because he’s a Democrat. It’s becau

This such a sad partisan take. Why would the NYT want to help a disgraced person they have no need to be loyal to? It’s not because he’s a Democrat. It’s because he’s any one that isn’t an excessive right wing mega spender (which includes very few names). That spans a lot of people in both parties. Aka centrist capitalists.