2 ms·
It would be fine to say that Bankman-Fried associated with or publicly endorsed the EA movement, those are both accurate statements of fact. The NYTimes is goi
by MichaelCollins 4y ago
It would be fine to say that Bankman-Fried associated with or publicly endorsed the EA movement, those are both accurate statements of fact. The NYTimes is going further, saying he was actually "bound to a commitment", elevating Bankman-Fried's claim of sincere altruistic motive to a fact.
I don't think professional journalists make this sort of mistake by accident, and if they did, it shouldn't have gotten past the editors.
- ninth_ant 4y agoIn the snippet you quoted, it said his circle of colleagues were bound to that commitment, which is an accurate summary. SBFs connections to the EA community seem to be pretty foundational to his success. There is no mistake here. You’re seemingly very upset by your own misinterpretation of this section of the article. Beyond what it says in that snippet, SBF did publicly pledge to give away the vast majority of his wealth. He was outspoken about his belief in Effective Altruism. You can certainly argue he scamming the others in the EA community with a false pledge and commitment to EA principles? But this aspect of the article was completely accurate.