3 ms·
Sure, that's their motives of course - to move people to a newer game and not have any distractions like lingering old stuff. If you only played for free then
by LawTalkingGuy 4y ago
Sure, that's their motives of course - to move people to a newer game and not have any distractions like lingering old stuff.
If you only played for free then it may sting but you have no right to compensation, only to annoyed venting.
But people are saying they paid $60 for it. They have a right to compensation. Moreover, it feels like this should not only be handled by individual damages related to the value of the product but also a fine or punitive damages related to what they thought they would gain from the scheme.