3 ms·
Why do you think so? :)
by avmich 4y ago
Why do you think so? :)
- sam_lowry_ 4y agovbezhenar has a history of erring on Putin's side
- vbezhenar 4y agoI definitely not erring on Zelensky's side, that's for sure. I'm trying to stay neutral, but Russian propaganda so far was much more convincing to me compared to Ukrainian one, so I might err on Putin's side despite not liking him at all.
- avmich 4y agoYou realize how much Ukraine has to lose playing like this?
- vbezhenar 4y ago
- bsagdiyev 4y agoOr Russia as a surface to surface as of this summer.
- justsomehnguy 4y agoIt's 900km+ from nearest Russian positions. Listed surface to surface mode for S300 is 120km.
- bsagdiyev 4y agoSure -- I was just refuting that only Ukraine was using them. This appears to have been an AA miss causing an accident.
- justsomehnguy 4y agoExcept they should had self-liquidated in the air, not through lithobraking. And for two missiles in a row? Want some real conspiracy theory? Two missiles means they were launched from the same site. Two missiles failed to self-liquidate is not very probable, means they had the SL system disabled. Now, even if there was a Russian missile - they were launched West and let to fall whereever it would be. Note, AFAIR S300 has a radio commanded self-liquidation, in addition to a built-in one on altitude and miss. If there was only one missile I could've believed it was a malfunction somewhere. Not with a two.