5 ms·
> doesn't really stand up to Occam's Razor, when "human error" is also on the menu. In questions like this, there should be some demonstration of attempts to a
by avmich 4y ago
> doesn't really stand up to Occam's Razor, when "human error" is also on the menu.
In questions like this, there should be some demonstration of attempts to avoid human errors. Here we have a massive attack on the whole territory, including regions at the border. We can wait for next actions from Russia - if they'd bring apologies and some good offers - but meantime it's a good idea to keep reaction going. After all, it's the approach proven to be most reliable when dealing with current Russia.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- vkou 4y ago> In questions like this, there should be some demonstration of attempts to avoid human errors. If I told you that a surgeon made two fatal mistakes, you can't conclude from that information whether or not he's made a lot, a little, or an average number of attempts to avoid human error in his work.