3 ms·

I work in a startup that uses ML for computer vision and I get the impression that there's significantly less commercial tooling to handle computer vision (or m

I work in a startup that uses ML for computer vision and I get the impression that there's significantly less commercial tooling to handle computer vision (or more generally, computer perception)-type data than tabular or text data. I get tons of salespeople contacting me about all sorts of solutions that I have no use for because they're not designed for image data. Don't get me wrong, there's tons of startups with tools for image/audio/video/point cloud/etc data as well, but generally they seem less mature/useful to me at this point in time. Activeloop is definitely interesting to me - I've tried it already, in fact, but it was a while ago so it was still a little bit half-baked I think.

davidbuniat 4y ago
As a matter of fact, I do agree - the CV space is less crowded (until now). That's hopefully where we come in! thanks a lot for the input, and thanks for trying us out. You know, it's always a work-in-progress, but we've actually done a major overhaul - this is our biggest release yet and I'd love it if you gave it a try, especially the querying feature we're super-proud of. :) https://docs.activeloop.ai/tutorials/querying-datasets https://docs.activeloop.ai/tutorials/querying-datasets here's a couple of playbooks on how the new features (visualization + querying + version control) play together to solve complex workflows. - https://docs.activeloop.ai/playbooks/training-with-lineage https://docs.activeloop.ai/playbooks/training-with-lineage - https://docs.activeloop.ai/playbooks/evaluating-model-performance https://docs.activeloop.ai/playbooks/evaluating-model-perfor... - https://docs.activeloop.ai/playbooks/training-reproducibility-with-wandb https://docs.activeloop.ai/playbooks/training-reproducibilit...