4 ms·

I did not think so either, although, SLA is the one method I'd guess, if I had to, just going by the main picture. SLA is indeed the process they used, but what

I did not think so either, although, SLA is the one method I'd guess, if I had to, just going by the main picture. SLA is indeed the process they used, but what really surprised me was that it's offered as a 3D printing service from JLPCB and PCBWay.

kube-system 4y ago
Did some searching because I was impressed with the quality as well, and I think they may technically be using polyjet instead of SLA.
javawizard 4y ago
Yeah this is definitely an SLA print. SLA is capable of amazing quality with respect to both dimensional tolerances and overall appearance of finished product. I've been on the fence about getting one. This post might be the thing that pushes me over the edge. HN readers: what SLA printers do you recommend?
- BoorishBears 4y ago
  I have an SLA printer (Prusa SL1) and rarely use it Unless you get an industrial printer, dimensional accuracy gets messy with SLA. Slicers can try and compensate, but you end up having to work around warping For organic shapes like figures I'm sure it's great, but as someone who prints functional items 99% of the time I'd rather tune an FDM printer than fight with my messy SLA machine
  - javawizard 4y ago
    Good to know. How bad exactly would you say accuracy is? Are we talking about a few hundreds of micrometers or a millimeter or more?
    - BoorishBears 4y ago
      Tenths of a millimeter not much worse than FDM in vacuum... the problem is those tenths vary based on shape (even more than with FDM), and can be non-uniform across a surface (flat surfaces tend to end up warped pretty easily)
- johnwalkr 4y ago
  We had a form labs printer at work and while the resolution was great, it was very messy to deal with, parts were brittle, curing took a long time, support structure was annoying to remove (and very time consuming to remove traces of), and over weeks or months most parts with any significant feature longer in one dimension warped. I don’t think anyone used it once as soon as we got an FDM printer.
  - javawizard 4y ago
    > and over weeks or months most parts with any significant feature longer in one dimension warped That's alarming. How bad are we talking about, like millimeters or fractions thereof? I really, really like the appearance of the case from TFA and would love to build similar enclosures for my projects, but if that comes at the expense of noticeable long term dimensional instability, no thanks.
    - johnwalkr 4y ago
      In a 10cm part, could get someone 3mm of warping perpendicular to the longest dimension. Admittedly, this can be mitigated by adding ribs and being careful about curing, but between this, messiness and brittleness, it was just fussy compared to FDM printing. This was already five years ago so I wouldn’t discount the technology altogether, I would just check for the printer and material you’re interested in.
- deleted 4y ago
  [deleted]
- skykooler 4y ago
  I have an Epax 3D and I've been pretty satisfied with it, although it does have a pretty small build area.
echeese 4y ago
I don't get how they got it so clear and without support marks.

kube-system 4y ago

Did some searching because I was impressed with the quality as well, and I think they may technically be using polyjet instead of SLA.

javawizard 4y ago

Yeah this is definitely an SLA print. SLA is capable of amazing quality with respect to both dimensional tolerances and overall appearance of finished product. I've been on the fence about getting one. This post might be the thing that pushes me over the edge. HN readers: what SLA printers do you recommend?

BoorishBears 4y ago
I have an SLA printer (Prusa SL1) and rarely use it Unless you get an industrial printer, dimensional accuracy gets messy with SLA. Slicers can try and compensate, but you end up having to work around warping For organic shapes like figures I'm sure it's great, but as someone who prints functional items 99% of the time I'd rather tune an FDM printer than fight with my messy SLA machine
- javawizard 4y ago
  Good to know. How bad exactly would you say accuracy is? Are we talking about a few hundreds of micrometers or a millimeter or more?
  - BoorishBears 4y ago
    Tenths of a millimeter not much worse than FDM in vacuum... the problem is those tenths vary based on shape (even more than with FDM), and can be non-uniform across a surface (flat surfaces tend to end up warped pretty easily)
johnwalkr 4y ago
We had a form labs printer at work and while the resolution was great, it was very messy to deal with, parts were brittle, curing took a long time, support structure was annoying to remove (and very time consuming to remove traces of), and over weeks or months most parts with any significant feature longer in one dimension warped. I don’t think anyone used it once as soon as we got an FDM printer.
- javawizard 4y ago
  > and over weeks or months most parts with any significant feature longer in one dimension warped That's alarming. How bad are we talking about, like millimeters or fractions thereof? I really, really like the appearance of the case from TFA and would love to build similar enclosures for my projects, but if that comes at the expense of noticeable long term dimensional instability, no thanks.
  - johnwalkr 4y ago
    In a 10cm part, could get someone 3mm of warping perpendicular to the longest dimension. Admittedly, this can be mitigated by adding ribs and being careful about curing, but between this, messiness and brittleness, it was just fussy compared to FDM printing. This was already five years ago so I wouldn’t discount the technology altogether, I would just check for the printer and material you’re interested in.
deleted 4y ago
[deleted]
skykooler 4y ago
I have an Epax 3D and I've been pretty satisfied with it, although it does have a pretty small build area.

echeese 4y ago

I don't get how they got it so clear and without support marks.