> It's pretty insane to me that you think the NYT would ever deliberately print accusations they couldn't prove. What are they doing when they cite "unnamed so

> It's pretty insane to me that you think the NYT would ever deliberately print accusations they couldn't prove. What are they doing when they cite "unnamed sources"? They constantly publish accusations that they have no intention of ever backing up. I'm not saying that they don't believe their sources, but "100% bulletproof" has never been their standard.