3 ms·
I think that was a reasonable assumption given our understanding of infectious diseases. In hindsight, that was incorrect, but you can't criticize a decision m
by xracy 4y ago
I think that was a reasonable assumption given our understanding of infectious diseases.
In hindsight, that was incorrect, but you can't criticize a decision made with limited information with perfect information, and pretend like you would've seen the perfect information at the time. It is reasonable to assume that viruses would be subject to herd immunity, because it's been true for the vast majority of viruses we've interacted with in the past.
- ls15 4y ago> you can't criticize a decision made with limited information with perfect information, and pretend like you would've seen the perfect information at the time. I can absolutely criticize handwavy low knowledge / high impact decisions afterwards, because that's what they were and that was clear to many at that time already. Consensus wasn't reached based on knowledge, but based on power. Luckily I came to that conclusion early during the pandemic, so I don't feel compelled to defend unethical decisions now.