>That's all there is to intersectionality That's really not "all there is" to intersectionality. You are repeating the motte-and-bailey of far-left ideologues

>That's all there is to intersectionality That's really not "all there is" to intersectionality. You are repeating the motte-and-bailey of far-left ideologues wherein you fall back on the official/original definition of the term, conveniently ignoring that its meaning has changed over time, and has been coopted. To be clear: I'm being charitable in my interpretation, and assuming you are not intentionally doing this.