"NYT would ever deliberately print accusations they couldn't prove." That statement implies a misrepresentation of what I said, and a misunderstanding of what

"NYT would ever deliberately print accusations they couldn't prove." That statement implies a misrepresentation of what I said, and a misunderstanding of what journalists do. Journalist investigate, source, and provide clarity. This is one of the biggest frauds in history, it's the job of the NYT to investigate the issue, and show us what's up. If there's likely fraud, they should be spelling that out. They've already admitted to using deposits to make risky bets at Alameda, which is fraud. There should have been a lot more questions about that alone. Just to start. Instead, it was a light nothingburger puff piece. There are better sourced artifacts on Twitter - this very article provides more valuable information that the NYT. "basically getting SBF to admit he was running a ponzi in an interview - an admission that made absolutely no difference because everyone kind of knew it was all a scam anyway" To suggest that the people with collectively billions in FTX 'knew it was a ponzi/fraud' and willingly lost all of their money is absurd.