4 ms·

This is patently untrue. search: `site:nytimes.com crypto`, it's overwhelmingly negative coverage. This specific article is either grossly uninformed reporting

• JeremyNT 4y ago
  > This is patently untrue. search: `site:nytimes.com crypto`, it's overwhelmingly negative coverage. What, like this about Celsius' collapse (by the same author as this piece): https://archive.ph/kHMNN https://archive.ph/kHMNN Or this about the crypto soccer team? https://archive.ph/dvSv6 https://archive.ph/dvSv6 Most of the negative coverage I see using your suggestion is very recent, or around specific events, or by op-ed contributors. But they have the "expert" David Yaffe-Bellany on staff to churn out feel-good crypto stories. > This specific article is either grossly uninformed reporting or politically motivated. I know people like to find conspiracies, but I think you can safely leave the politics out of it. To me it looks like they put a crypto bro in charge of reporting crucial crypto failures, rather than to default assuming that the entire space is full of fraudsters and crime and putting a real reporter on it.