If voting changed anything, they'd make it illegal. https://coinpedia.org/crypto-live-news/ftx-ceo-in-connection-with-sec-chair-gary-gensler/ https://coinpedia

If voting changed anything, they'd make it illegal. https://coinpedia.org/crypto-live-news/ftx-ceo-in-connection-with-sec-chair-gary-gensler/ https://coinpedia.org/crypto-live-news/ftx-ceo-in-connection... https://www.foxbusiness.com/markets/sec-chairman-gary-gensler-met-with-head-ftx-months-before-collapse https://www.foxbusiness.com/markets/sec-chairman-gary-gensle... https://twitter.com/bof_tob/status/1592247076100112385/photo/1 https://twitter.com/bof_tob/status/1592247076100112385/photo... https://twitter.com/jchervinsky/status/1592173682687938560 https://twitter.com/jchervinsky/status/1592173682687938560 https://twitter.com/SenLummis/status/1592212987259281408 https://twitter.com/SenLummis/status/1592212987259281408 This is speculation, but this is starting to fit the classic playbook of: 1) Create / seize a crisis 2) Have new regulation already ready to "address" crisis (using voter outrage to pass under rushed conditions) 3) Incrementally increase regulatory control (regulatory capture) 4) profit / increase power concentration In this case, it's clear they are trying to establish CFTC control of eth & btc.