4 ms·
Handling the privacy of other people might be oddly easy. If you can detect the voice accurately enough the AI might be able to _drop_ the other participants.
by moritonal 4y ago
Handling the privacy of other people might be oddly easy. If you can detect the voice accurately enough the AI might be able to _drop_ the other participants.
- unstatusthequo 4y agoDropping after the fact still means it was recorded, this violating two party notice statutes.
- TOMDM 4y agoWhat if it was never written to disk? The identification and trimming happening before any audio is actually saved. Is picking someone else up on microphone at all a violation of two party consent? For example walking past someone in public with a loudspeaker call active.
- riiri778 4y agoI think there is even legal precedent for that. Dragnet surveillance recording of all phone calls. It was argued that recordings are only "stored". Judge order is needed for "retrieval", that may be several weeks later.
- morsch 4y agoDoes that mean that every phone recording audio to detect its assistant trigger phrase villages two party notice statutes?
- humanistbot 4y agoYes.
- morsch 4y agoThese assistants have been around for a while, seems like that would have been established in court if it was the case.