5 ms·

So what are they then if that's a really long bow to draw?

• PuppyTailWags 4y ago
  It makes sense to just call the creature what it is in its cultural context as opposed to trying to put an ill-fitting separate cultural notion on it, imo. If something is a taniwha it's a taniwha, and if someone is curious what a taniwha is they can look it up themselves and understand its a creature from a specific region's folklore. I feel that trying to rename culturally-specific things that don't have a neat translation, like folkloric beings, is generally always poorly fitting. It's like when the qilin is called a unicorn, when a qilin is a fish-scaled deer or ox with lizardly facial features and no affiliation with femininity or maidenhood. So basically almost nothing like a unicorn.
  • tux2bsd 4y ago
    Like I said leprechaun, taniwha, unicorn... all mythical entities - just like ghosts. Isn't it funny how people can draw these various mythical creatures but only after another person has shown them how.
• tux2bsd 4y ago
  Exactly. It is puzzling that those individuals feel the need to attempt to suppress what they elect not to agree with.