2 ms·

>Layer 1 scaling is poor design. Larger blockchain = less nodes due to more expensive hardware requirements = more centralization. >A $10/month VPS will have a

>Layer 1 scaling is poor design. Larger blockchain = less nodes due to more expensive hardware requirements = more centralization. >A $10/month VPS will have a 1 gigabit connection. >Larger blocks = more bandwidth and hd space = more time to download and fully validate. >You originally said it was all about bandwidth before being proved wrong with how absurd that idea is. Now it's "cloud hosting" even though people are running nodes off of raspberry pis and cable modems. If you continuously misrepresent what was said a few posts ago then I can tell this conversation is going nowhere and is a waste of time. You were the one that brought up vps pricing and hosting. I will move on now since it is clear you are out of your depth but good luck trying to change bitcoin. Just know there is good reason nobody will adopt your shortsighted ideas regardless of where you post them, reddit or elsewhere.

CyberDildonics 4y ago
You were the one that brought up vps pricing and hosting. And you're response was "what about 100x the traffic" and the answer is, it would still work. If you continuously misrepresent what was said a few posts ago This didn't happen. All these conversations are the same because you're getting your information from the same place as other people saying the same thing. If a whole bunch of people say 1 + 1 = 3, it's pretty obvious they didn't all arrive at that conclusion independently. Why do you think non-mining nodes are so important? Why won't you link to where you got this idea in the first place? Why aren't you acknowledging all the parts of the bitcoin white paper that contradicts what you're saying? Also think about how much your arguments shifted. First it was 'bandwidth' and 'diskspace'. When I show you that's absurd you move to sync times. When I point out that you are talking about 1% CPU usage, your own numbers (two days over 13 years) back up what I'm saying and that lots of other currencies have already done what you're saying is impossible you move on to more inane arguments and finally say that you've already proved everything. I will move on now since it is clear you are out of your depth Right, the person who gave you a mountain of evidence, has read the server source code, has actually read the white paper (it's only a few pages) and understands the current state of other cryptocurrencies is out of their depth and you (who has given no actual evidence or a single external link to anything) is somehow an authority. This is delusion and we both know it. Link evidence for anything, link to where you 'learned' what you know. Back up what you're saying in any way at all.

CyberDildonics 4y ago

You were the one that brought up vps pricing and hosting. And you're response was "what about 100x the traffic" and the answer is, it would still work. If you continuously misrepresent what was said a few posts ago This didn't happen. All these conversations are the same because you're getting your information from the same place as other people saying the same thing. If a whole bunch of people say 1 + 1 = 3, it's pretty obvious they didn't all arrive at that conclusion independently. Why do you think non-mining nodes are so important? Why won't you link to where you got this idea in the first place? Why aren't you acknowledging all the parts of the bitcoin white paper that contradicts what you're saying? Also think about how much your arguments shifted. First it was 'bandwidth' and 'diskspace'. When I show you that's absurd you move to sync times. When I point out that you are talking about 1% CPU usage, your own numbers (two days over 13 years) back up what I'm saying and that lots of other currencies have already done what you're saying is impossible you move on to more inane arguments and finally say that you've already proved everything. I will move on now since it is clear you are out of your depth Right, the person who gave you a mountain of evidence, has read the server source code, has actually read the white paper (it's only a few pages) and understands the current state of other cryptocurrencies is out of their depth and you (who has given no actual evidence or a single external link to anything) is somehow an authority. This is delusion and we both know it. Link evidence for anything, link to where you 'learned' what you know. Back up what you're saying in any way at all.