3 ms·
I think you're misunderstanding what the NYT article is, it's not a piece of deep investigative journalism, it's an interview with SBF with context attached.
by SilverBirch 4y ago
I think you're misunderstanding what the NYT article is, it's not a piece of deep investigative journalism, it's an interview with SBF with context attached.
- headsoup 4y agoSo an entertainment piece, as mentioned? I can't see the article because of the login, but what does the piece achieve? Does the interview ask Sam hard questions?
- wikfwikf 4y agoThere is a mirror of the NYT article linked from TFA.
- wikfwikf 4y agoRight. So it was accurately described by the author of the linked article as 'a poorly researched fluff piece'.
- keneda7 4y agoI am generally curious what your position is here? You seem to be arguing the NYT article is not a fluff piece but then with this comment you admit its not investigative journalism but rather a fluff piece? I don't understand.