3 ms·
There's so much rampant speculation in this article... for me it lost a degree of credibility around the point he fixated on the drug aspect. Despite all the d
by rkagerer 4y ago
There's so much rampant speculation in this article... for me it lost a degree of credibility around the point he fixated on the drug aspect. Despite all the disclaimers.
Yes, it paints one picture of how the losses could have added up, but I'm looking forward to more exhaustively investigated reports grounded in more than heresay and gossip.
- andromeduck 4y agoWe have photographic evidence. What more do you need? This isn't a criminal court.
- HDThoreaun 4y agoThat picture could've been literally anything as far as I could tell
- andromeduck 4y agohttps://twitter.com/autismcapital/status/1592237980458323969?s=46&t=lKiusoeb_7UDuTzsThNEjg https://twitter.com/autismcapital/status/1592237980458323969...
- TheOtherHobbes 4y agoCompletely unrealistic. You'll never find rampant drug abuse in the financial industry. Certainly not on Wall St.
- williamcotton 4y agoIs it more fun to read and talk about the story if it covers existing tropes about rampant drug abuse in the financial industry or more fun to read and talk the story without those tropes? Is it more fun if the shared story has a clear villain or more fun if the shared story has a diffusive, complex relationship between good and bad between not only the characters but also the readers?
- anonymoushn 4y agoIf Alameda employees tell Twitter DM groups of systematic traders what happened at Alameda, it's hearsay, but if they tell NYT employees, it's an exhaustively investigated report.