4 ms·
Since the central bank controls the unit of account value and can always devalue and print itself out of any sticky situation, the only meaningful way it can go
by manholio 4y ago
Since the central bank controls the unit of account value and can always devalue and print itself out of any sticky situation, the only meaningful way it can go "bankrupt" is to lose the ability to appreciate the currency. I agree it's a stretch.
The notion that the central bank can conjure pure profits out of thin air and has no liability against its issued currency is fantastical, it would suggest a perpetual profit machine. In reality, any issued currency comes with a strong liability to buy it back in inflationary times, so it's clearly an external debt from the CB's perspective, this is a well established notion.
This has origin in the pre-modern, free banking era, where competing private banks issued "bank notes" attesting their demand deposits, and which in time became widely accepted. This is basically the exact thing a central bank does, with a state granted monopoly, and no link to the gold and silver the bank "owes" for the notes.
- lottin 4y agoSorry, I can't agree that there's some unspoken promise, or even a faint expectation, that that the central bank will buy its own currency back. This is simply not true.
- manholio 4y agoBuy back is implicit in the price stability mission any central bank has; it cannot be fulfilled without controlling the supply of currency in the economy, i.e (at least) limited buyback. Without that, what you get is something very much like a cryptocurrency in terms of volatility.
- lottin 4y agoThere is no implicit promise of buying back their own coins. This is ridiculous.