3 ms·
Click bait title. They are considered harmful by the author primarily due to the authors own moral code and opinions.
by w4ffl35 4y ago
Click bait title. They are considered harmful by the author primarily due to the authors own moral code and opinions.
- walrus01 4y agoNot wanting private capital firms to hijack .org (look into the history of Ethos Capital and Fadi Chehade) is a valid political and economic position. Without the massive community backlash towards it a couple of years ago I have no doubt they would have been successful.
- w4ffl35 4y agoYes, it's easy to organize mobs on the internet and mobilize them for ones own personal ideologies, economic positions and gain.
- williamscales 4y agoI'm really tired of seeing the obligatory comment of this form on nearly every article posted. I mean...no shit? I won't entirely go out on a limb here but I really can't recall any article titled "X considered harmful" that wasn't an opinion being stated.
- w4ffl35 4y agoIt's a goofy blog post and title in which the author is attempting to woke mob io TLD so I pointed it out.
- duxup 4y agoI think there is a space to say that the author has moral issues with sites associated with a TLD… but there’s not technical harm occurring, like malicious software, viruses and etc.
- wumpus 4y agoHow dare that guy have a clear opinion that he's willing to back up with reasons! Way better than Dijkstra being pithy about everything.
- duxup 4y agoI found it difficult to understand the reasoning on that page to object to a TLD.
- w4ffl35 4y agoI found the article to be irrelevant and only clicked the link because I thought I was going to find a technical reason as to why the .io domain would be considered harmful. Instead I found an author's opinion as to why the .io domain would be considered harmful to the author and other's who would share the author's concerns which are not technical in nature. Title is click-bait, article has no impact on my decision making process when purchasing TLDs.