3 ms·
That's actually an interesting anecdote, because it demonstrates a willingness to admit when he was wrong, something that is often uncommon among so-called "gre
by adriand 15y ago
That's actually an interesting anecdote, because it demonstrates a willingness to admit when he was wrong, something that is often uncommon among so-called "great thinkers" - especially when they're engaging with a member of the "ordinary public". (My apologies if you're actually quite extraordinary.)
- bravura 15y agoI think it's one of his most admirable qualities, namely that he will admit fault, change his position, and correct himself when he overspeaks. My apologies if you're actually quite extraordinary. None taken. [edit: A question I asked him at the NYPL, 55:30 in the video http://www.nypl.org/audiovideo/god-not-great-debate-between-christopher-hitchens-and-al-sharpton http://www.nypl.org/audiovideo/god-not-great-debate-between-... Q: In the beginning of the talk you expressed antipathy towards deism in principle, predicated along this particular interpretation of God as a supreme dictator and judge. Is that correct? CHRISTOPHER HITCHENS: That would be correct, yes. Q: Now, if I could play devil’s advocate for God for a moment. Could you appreciate a God who watches us and our actions eagerly and with great interest because he created a world where everything is permitted? CHRISTOPHER HITCHENS: Yes, I can picture it, but I’m not without horror. (laughter) ]